Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Online poker v/s physical poker

Online poker v/s physical poker

The Internet has made life easier in the 21st century. It has changed the face of various systems in various fields. Gambling is not an exception to these changes. There are so many online casinos that don't require us to leave home at all. This brings a lot of changes and challenges to which we have to adapt to. There are great many differences between the normal way of playing poker and the one people play sitting before the computer

The most obvious disadvantage in online poker compared to the one played face to face comes from the fact than one cannot note the changes in body language and the reactions of other opponents. This is generally used in the face to face version to guess the type of cards the person has.

So instead of guessing the type of cards an opponent has by the facial expressions, one should pay attention to the reaction time, the patters with which they bet and the speed of playing. Every change the internet has brought about has been adapted to, and poker is no different! So it is better to make intelligent guesses by the above parameters than blaming the online versions. There is a great difference in the rate with which the game is played and speed.

There is an advantage in the online versions as of the number of tables you can play at. In an offline face to face poker game, it is impossible to be sitting at two places at once and hence the multiple table option is scored off. So, in an online version the chances of winning are much higher as one can sit at a lot of tables. Needless to say, the income also gets increased in an online version.

The best thing that can happen to a novice who wants to learn the rules and basics of the game is the online version. This is because of the presence of the poker schools which buck up the beginner in to moving on to higher levels of comfort. In these online versions one has an option of clicking a button and adding more money to the budget. There are even practice rooms where one plays for fake money. This is a great advantage over conventional poker as the beginner does not have to lose money at the beginning, before he gets accustomed. This can hearten the novices as they can greatly improve before having to play with real money.

There is also a major difference as far the limits are concerned. In an online poker table it is not uncommon to see a limit so low as one cent while at the conventional table the limits are generally higher as much as one dollar.

There are a lot of aspects regarding the comparison. The first thing may be is whether we have enough resources to travel to a Casino and blow it over at a conventional casino. One more is whether we have enough experience to take on a much more regular professional. A lot of people who go to casinos are pretty professional and have been at the tables for a long time. So unless we are very good at it, it is better to take the easier way, spend time on the basics online, have a go at it using fake money, before moving on to the real world.

We can actually risk much lesser money and get the feeling of Las Vegas sitting right at our homes and yet win money without having to step out. This suits a lot of people who hate traveling and those who are very busy.

Monday, April 20, 2009

a bad saturday

Woke småbakis without breakfast in lyan, after an in itself, pleasant evening with some work buddies.

After having walked to Ica-Ettan and then petat me some sandwiches I drove a three-hour money-session with a lot of, but ended lill plus.

Then began the hunger to make itself felt again and I went to the generally excellent Matin correction Milles, to get a hamburger.
The guy in the door saw that I had VLT-jacket and was wondering if we could come and write something about the city's most ancient lineage korvmoj. He had just taken over the place, he says.
I gave him some names and phone numbers, which I deeply regretted when I got home and put teeth into the dinner.

It was shit in me the most disgusting I have ever tasted. French fritesen each of the 70-century version you know, really thick, with great grooves and completely soft.
Hamburgers were even worse - the meat tasted of soap or detergent and at a yellow, soft mass which was unable to identify by either flavor or form.
Salad? Onions?
Not a susning.

I think I have never tossed a hamburger before when I was hungry, but this is about survival.

It got to be more cash game instead, and Party Saturday tournament ($ 320). I should have known what it was for the type of day when I bust the following quarter.

Hand # 7995410652 begins at 2009/04/18
Dealing down cards
Dealt Thursday Snorleker Tight [Ks Kd]
Ross Flush posts the small blind of 30
Michael__NN posts the big blind of 60
winkiac raise Thursday 180.
bokkie87 folds.
Jumak folds.
Sebkad folds.
Silent_Ari calls 180.
ClderHrt calls 180.
Snorleker Tight raise Thursday 720.
El_Pap folds.
Ross Flush folds.
Michael__NN folds.
winkiac folds.
Silent_Ari calls 540.
ClderHrt calls 540.
Dealing Flop [2c 8c 9s]
Silent_Ari checks.
ClderHrt beet 6115, and is all-in.
Snorleker Tight calls 3220, and is all-in.
Silent_Ari calls 5110, and is all-in.
Dealing Turn [6c]
Dealing River [4s]
Silent_Ari shows [Ts Js]
Silent_Ari has High Card, Jack
ClderHrt shows [4c 3c]
ClderHrt has Flush, Eight High
Tight punk shows [Ks Kd]
Snorleker Tight has One Pair, Kings
ClderHrt wins 15,870

Cash gametes were in a similar style. in one of the tables (3-6 NL), I had position on a guy with governmental 68/36. For those of you who do not use the tools, I can tell that to mean that he voluntarily stops the money (blind not included) into the pot in 68% of your hands and come in with an increase in 36% of donors. He also over-sized stain every time he c-grazed.
It is quite exploitable:)

But unfortunately, I managed to not deal with him. Float did not work at all, for he always came up with new megabet in turn.
Residual therefore to reach a hand.

He had taken me for over a total of uptag when I thought I had the chance. I had opened UTG for 18 with AQs and all had put him in big. He re-raise to 72, which normally represent a great hand, but with him I knew I probably had him beaten, so I called.

QT x flop and he had the 150, I just called, to his type of player, there is great value in playing passively and letting him hang himself.
Turn A, and now he had the 200. Now perhaps I should have put in, but we were very deep and I did not want to leave any money on the table, so I called again - quite sure that he would tear whatever came or what he had.

River J, and he set correctly for my last 300.
Nothing fun river card, but the pot odds, and his style of play made it to a particular vision.
He shows K9o and India was a broken man.

On the other table went no further, but thanks to a strong pickup in the end, I managed to get minuset to stay around $ 600.

Should be very nice to sleep out of this shit on Saturday:)

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Get rid of winetasting!

Wine is good and wine tasting is a social and pleasant thing. It should clearly be prohibited.

Some people have problems with alcohol, we know of course. If you also have fun when you drink, there will be extra difficult to stop.

Prohibit therefore wine tasting is now live!

If someone still want to drink, it can usefully be done in a dedicated units which the State places.

It stops in a pengeplassering, yawning and a splash preferably relatively poor wine right in the mouth. Kind of like a gas station, but without the hot dog or seats.

National Alcohol Study expresses the problem very well:

"Around some drinks, such as wine tasting and viskyprovning, can occur subcultures with specific vocabulary, intricate knowledge of the drink, and specific social norms. Tasters can spend much time together in such subcultures, feel a strong affinity, and to create specific identities."

The type of social drinking got away. Wine tasting should not be allowed.

Right?
I know this has nothing to do with gambling but this was just a thought i had on my mind. Do not forget to check out casinogirl

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Greatest poker bonus list site available.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Poker is an interactive game, and it is good. But the investigation has been playing a completely different view on these things.

--

There is much interaction in poker. Poker is entirely based on the interaction between players. That is the point of the game.

Poker is a highly interactive game, and it is something good. But the investigation has been playing a completely different view on these things. (Sorry I went on about gambling investigation. Shall stop as soon pokern is free.)

In games investigation definition means "interactive" the game is via electromagnetic waves. Yes, it is true!

"Interactive games: lotteries transmitted using electromagnetic waves, and where participation can take place only with the help of electromagnetic waves."

We wonder: what is interactivity with the underlying technology to do? The definition seems incomprehensible, and taken from the air.

That is, if not now the intention is that in the very definition consign a positive aspect outside the framework for discussion? The equation is simpler then ...

No, allow interaction, I say.
--------------------

I sat and just random broswed the world wide web ysterday and i found this you might enjoy it, because i did.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Most online poker players is expected that they can use the same strategy when playing offline poker. Everything is equal, you get two 'down cards', five' community cards' and play against up to nine other players. It is however a few important differences that will allow you to online poker players quickly realize that you must adjust your game a bit before you throw yourself into the world of online poker players. One clear difference is that it often becomes shorter game sessions you participate in online poker players.

You can sit at a table and settle with you to play a few hands, then quickly move to another table and play forward, where, if you want to. When you play offline, you do not have that opportunity because you often play against the same opponents at up to several hours at a time - yes a few times up to 8-10 hours in line. It is rarely as long as it is with online poker. When you play online, your opponent is rarely time to time to check out of your game properly and create an impression of you. That means that the ability to bluff to victory is often less.

When you play in the physical world, you can often attract other players to believe that you are bluffing, by promoting 'loose' and it can give you a bigger pot, but it's not always playing online. When you play online, it is necessary to vary your game. My experience is that it is best to do when you play offline. Online, it is better to play more bold and not worry about so much of what the other players think about you. It is seldom you can create you a 'profile' and read people's weaknesses when you play online.

Rakeback
Also look at Blog